Amid sturdy opposition from key stakeholders, the Cupboard Committee on Vitality (CCOE) led by Minister for Planning and Growth Asad Umar has placed on maintain the unbundling of two fuel utilities — Sui Northern Fuel Pipelines Ltd (SNGPL) and Sui Southern Fuel Firm Ltd (SSGCL) — till a complete, possible and time-bound street map for gas-sector reforms is accessible.
He agrees that the unbundling of fuel corporations into transmission and distribution corporations just isn’t the target per se and classes ought to be learnt from power-sector reforms that started with the unbundling of energy corporations in 1992.
Responding to a query, he candidly accepted that it was the Energy Division’s “absolutely bad decision” to lately ask energy distribution corporations to signal administration contracts with Pakistan Electrical Energy Firm (Pepco) abolished nearly a decade in the past.
Mr Umar stated the unbundling of Wapda via power-sector reforms launched in 1992 through Pepco might have been profitable with an envisaged sundown interval of three to 4 years. However unbundling with out related reforms “played havoc with the power sector and the country”.
It’s not straightforward to search out 14 chief govt officers for energy corporations. The ability centre within the Energy Division has to finish to permit competitors, he stated, including that “precisely because of this reason, I have not approved the unbundling of gas companies until we have a complete and bankable road map” for administration construction, loss discount, effectivity enchancment and pricing reforms.
‘I won’t approve the unbundling of fuel corporations till we’ve a whole and bankable street map for reforms,’ says Asad Umar
In consequence, the CCOE directed the Petroleum Division to “prepare a comprehensive strategy for regulatory and policy reform of the gas sector and implement short-term measures for efficiency enhancement and loss reduction” despite the fact that it typically agreed that for the long term, the street map to a aggressive fuel market was required the place the non-public sector ought to carry out an lively function.
Based mostly on the above, the federal cupboard didn’t approve the abstract on the unbundling of fuel corporations, confirmed Particular Adviser to the Prime Minister on Petroleum Nadeem Babar. He stated the cupboard requested for an entire reform package deal for the fuel sector, together with transmission, distribution, discount in unaccounted-for fuel (UFG), technological inductions, system enlargement and so forth.
The Ministry of Vitality’s Petroleum Division (MEPD), as a part of its understanding given to worldwide lending businesses, proposed the rapid appointment of a transaction adviser to work out the unbundling of SNGPL and SSGCL into 5 corporations.
The MEPD has proposed the creation of a Nationwide Fuel Transmission Firm (NGTC) to take over the transmission system of each fuel utilities and function as a standard provider for present and newly fashioned fuel distribution corporations like Nationwide Transmission and Despatch Firm (NTDC) within the energy sector.
It expects third-party entry by non-public corporations to the NGTC fuel community that won’t itself have interaction within the sale and buy of fuel however solely transport it and cost wheeling prices to all suppliers and purchasers of native fuel or imported liquefied pure fuel (LNG). Some influential gamers with connections in proper locations had been within the NGTC shareholding.
Underneath the plan, the distribution community of the 2 fuel corporations would then be divided into a number of distribution corporations with unified rules by each SNGPL and SSGCL throughout the space of their jurisdictions for operation of smaller enterprise items or distribution corporations. “The companies would be established on a technical and economical basis, including population, network density, gas demand, workload and management/supervision and efficiency for the sustainability of newly formed gas distribution companies,” the MEPD advisable.
The Petroleum Division can be looking for approval for “a mechanism of weighted average sale price equalisation or any other suitable mechanism (that) would be developed for gas sale pricing and the same would be implemented simultaneously”. It claims its proposed construction had develop into inevitable as Article 158 of the Structure promised “precedence to the gas-producing province over other parts of the country in use of gas who now demand uninterrupted supplies based on surplus production”.
Additionally, it argues that rising fuel demand and depleting native fuel manufacturing have been increasing the hole for which heavy reliance was shifting in direction of imported LNG. A few of its arguments are disappointing to say the least. It confirms the willingness of the non-public sector to arrange new LNG terminals with out conceding the actual fact the Petroleum Division and different arms of the federal government have been hampering progress. It additionally concedes its failure in UFG management and reluctance of the prevailing shoppers to pay the next price for imported fuel moreover the Energy Division backtracking on its LNG commitments.
The regulator has opposed the abstract and suggested that “mechanism/approach of unbundling should first be decided in consultation with all the stakeholders/provincial governments, including the approval of the Council of Common Interests (CCI), before the appointment of any consultant since the terms of reference (ToR) of such consultant shall depend on the mutually agreed mechanism”. It additionally opposed the bifurcation of the 2 present corporations into 5 or a number of entities earlier than the completion of advisory duties by the transaction adviser, particularly the feasibility of proposed reforms within the first place and wished a examine of classes learnt from the unbundling of Wapda.
The Monetary Sustainability Group of consultants from numerous private and non-private sectors, whereas reviewing the World Financial institution’s street map for gas-sector reforms, had concluded just a few months in the past that fuel distribution corporations (Discos) would develop into invariably unsustainable and loss-making entities and solely NTGC (Transco) could be worthwhile, which might then have to subsidise Discos.
Printed in Daybreak, The Enterprise and Finance Weekly, November 30th, 2020